• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Why Trump Can’t Shake Jeffrey Epstein BuckGalaxy July 18, 2025 8:07 pm (CurrentEvents)

Colbert cancelled. ER July 17, 2025 8:20 pm (CurrentEvents)

just passin' thru... ER July 16, 2025 2:08 pm (Space/Science)

Epic Epstein Magasphere Meltdown BuckGalaxy July 14, 2025 1:58 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » CurrentEvents

The neural whip March 12, 2012 5:44 am ER

http://news.yahoo.com/us-military-unveils-non-lethal-heat-ray-weapon-032512781.html

In one of Asimov’s stories, his characters use a non-lethal weapon called a “neural whip”, to discourage attacks by hostile aliens or beasts. It causes intense pain at a distance, but no injury.

“Non-lethal weapons” is an oxymoron. Everything which stops short of killing, such as fire hoses, tear gas, incapacitating agents, rubber bullets, cattle prods, etc, is to be preferred to gunfire from a humane standpoint, but even panic in a crowd can cause death. And anything that incapacitates a healthy young adult has the potential to hurt the old, young, or the seriously wounded. Even if the potential for injury is reduced, it is made up for by the increased temptation to use the weapon because it is “harmless”. Our experience with tasers has already shown abuses.

I guess it always come down to whether the unruly target is a dangerous mob, or peacefully assembled citizen demonstrators. Unfortunately, its always the side with the guns who gets to make that judgement.

All the technology in the world doesn’t free you from the responsibility of making a moral choice. But it can make you forget that you still have the responsibility to do so.

  • I agree with what you are saying. AND, what a way to scan for snipers!!! If it has ... by bowser 2012-03-12 17:54:18
    • I think crowd control is more what they had in mind. by ER 2012-03-12 18:46:59
    • True, true. I always hate it when people praise new "non-lethal" weapons. If it can be used to harm ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-12 14:41:10

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register