Those of you who follow some of my more philosophical posts (“nature-of-the-universe-shit”, subjective perception vs objective reality, etc) may recognize that Peter Russell seems to be sailing some of the same seas I’ve been exploring lately.
I’d never heard of him until today, so I can honestly say he has not influenced me in any way. But I like what he has to say. He makes a lot more sense than most of these touchy-feely, Swami Suchabanana guys normally do. He also seems to have a good background in the hard sciences, so I am comfortable with the way he thinks.
If you’re curious about where my head is at,
- I may not understand.
-
I have noticed a change in you ER over the past years concerning the more esoteric. You ridiculed. You opposed...you ...
-
"you are not the self evident though."
-
Oh ER...I apologize...This is so interesting...but I was extremely fatigued last night. I had no business trying to post.
Long story ...
-
More tolerant? Hardly.
-
I find that depending on what level of understanding one is at, perceptions, possibilities, increase.
The Universe is infinite...as is the ...
-
I'm not sure I agree with that.
-
Chaotic? That would be your perception.
-
Touché.
-
Touché.
-
Chaotic? That would be your perception.
-
I'm not sure I agree with that.
-
I find that depending on what level of understanding one is at, perceptions, possibilities, increase.
The Universe is infinite...as is the ...
-
More tolerant? Hardly.
-
Oh ER...I apologize...This is so interesting...but I was extremely fatigued last night. I had no business trying to post.
Long story ...
-
"you are not the self evident though."