• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Muskfinger - and other evil space billionaires BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 10:19 pm (Space/Science)

New Glenn set for its second launch on November 9 BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 9:15 pm (Space/Science)

Spanberger projected to win VA BuckGalaxy November 4, 2025 5:10 pm (CurrentEvents)

The destruction of Goddard is illegal RL October 31, 2025 9:41 am (Space/Science)

Weighing the scales on Elon Musk BuckGalaxy October 30, 2025 9:28 pm (Flame)

Bunker Envy ? podrock October 30, 2025 6:18 pm (CurrentEvents)

Message in a bottle BuckGalaxy October 29, 2025 10:55 am (Off-Topic)

According to some, we're a nation of illiterate dependents looking for a handout RobVG October 27, 2025 8:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

The 1% RobVG October 27, 2025 10:54 am (Off-Topic)

Parting Shot ER October 27, 2025 4:36 am (Off-Topic)

Space X put on notice RobVG October 20, 2025 4:55 pm (Space/Science)

Home » Flame

Doesn't burning books create CO2? May 4, 2013 5:19 pm TB

From San Jose State University (post has since been quickly shoved down the Memory Hole):

Given her choice in office decor, maybe the problem isn’t political.

 

 

  • You realized that pic is staged, right? by alcaray 2013-05-05 20:17:17
    • But they shouldn't be burned, not even symbolically. by ER 2013-05-05 20:45:46
      • symbolic burning only contributes to symbolic CO2 by alcaray 2013-05-05 20:57:44

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register