-
This concludes this test of the system.
We now return you to your original programming.
-
I imagine Tom originally posted the Rushkoff essay in some forlorn hope that all the lefties here would read it ...
-
No, I posted it to display a "media analyst" who floated the idea that a large portion of the population ...
-
TB, we have always lived in a society where not working was not only allowed, it was a sign of ...
- Ten foot pole. You know damn well the author was not talking about dependents. Or successful investors.
-
TB, we have always lived in a society where not working was not only allowed, it was a sign of ...
-
No, I posted it to display a "media analyst" who floated the idea that a large portion of the population ...
-
Heading down to the Art and Wine festival.
Later!
-
This guy goes in a different direction with Rushkoff's essay:
Increasingly, perhaps, a job is something that we each have to ...
- The man makes some good points, although I have difficulty seeing how they can actually be realized in practice. ...
-
One of the problems with the essay is it makes the mistake, common nowadays, of thinking of a "job" as ...
-
Moved to Flame.
- Why thank you ER...I was a candy striper...do you need to use the bedpan? ...there is more to the concept of ...
-
I simply can not wrap my brain around work not being jobs...and jobs not being work.
They are one in the ...
-
That's because you think of work as wage slavery: Something unpleasant you begrudgingly do because you have to eat, ...
-
Not all jobs are drudgery, although some always will be.
Craftsmen still earn their way in many, many fields. Heck, ...
-
EDITED:So why aren't you working for Google, or starting your own Google?
C'mon Tom. If making sandals and running a ...
-
The system will work again when we no longer have a government in power that believes that the private sector ...
-
Conservative freedom rhetoric doesn't fool anyone. Every single policy consideration they propose is one that will benefit them immediately, and ...
-
My statement still stands, a simple one that had no outrage in it.
People are learning who the thugs are.
-
My statement still stands, a simple one that had no outrage in it.
People are learning who the thugs are.
-
Conservative freedom rhetoric doesn't fool anyone. Every single policy consideration they propose is one that will benefit them immediately, and ...
-
I tried. Several times. I didn't make it. That's called "reality."
-
The system will work again when we no longer have a government in power that believes that the private sector ...
-
EDITED:So why aren't you working for Google, or starting your own Google?
C'mon Tom. If making sandals and running a ...
-
Not all jobs are drudgery, although some always will be.
Craftsmen still earn their way in many, many fields. Heck, ...
-
That's because you think of work as wage slavery: Something unpleasant you begrudgingly do because you have to eat, ...
-
"Please convince me that we’re living in the best of all possible worlds under capitalism."
I can't. The responses to ...
-
Define "impossible".
-
Rushkoff is wrong. Dead wrong. I won't even mention his ignorance of history.
There is no "America" producing goods ...
-
I don't understand Rushkoff. He wrote a book "Program or be Programmed". To me I took this as being pro ...
-
I wouldn't infer acquiescence from somebody speaking up about a problem. And I don't really see how reexamining the structure ...
-
I haven't read all the background comprising this thread but I will say that the idea of food and shelter ...
-
Believe it or not, I have some sympathy for the argument, but it's mostly left wing Utopian baloney.
This guy makes ...
-
You forgot the one about liberals eating their children.
-
No, that's not how you respond to a "smear." Your response should be "no, Jody, the Left is very ...
-
No, that is exactly how I respond to a smear.
-
I am sorry you are disappointed in what I said Robert.
I am not. It feels strangely cathartic.
- "Cathartic" means using other people as punching bags. That's really nothing to be proud of.
-
In short, you got nothing. Want to go into a tally of smears and empty insults?
-
I am sorry you are disappointed in what I said Robert.
I am not. It feels strangely cathartic.
-
No, that is exactly how I respond to a smear.
-
No, that's not how you respond to a "smear." Your response should be "no, Jody, the Left is very ...
-
You forgot the one about liberals eating their children.
- Which "better one" would that be? And how have identical ideas worked in the past?
-
I haven't read all the background comprising this thread but I will say that the idea of food and shelter ...
-
I wouldn't infer acquiescence from somebody speaking up about a problem. And I don't really see how reexamining the structure ...
-
Rushkoff is wrong. Dead wrong. I won't even mention his ignorance of history.
There is no "America" producing goods ...
-
You don't need proof because you have already decided on the truth.
You're just wrong Tom. Your beliefs are more ...
- This from the guy who constantly lectures my on my "arrogance." Two points: A definition that can mean anything you ...
- Some jobs are becoming obsolete, to be sure. But my thought is that because of technology, jobs are being created. Hasn't ...
-
Define "impossible".