• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

So, it is official RL June 6, 2025 5:39 pm (Space/Science)

"Remember, what the dormouse said, ER June 5, 2025 4:14 pm (Space/Science)

"Make my day" BuckGalaxy June 5, 2025 1:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

NSIDC Data drop ER June 4, 2025 9:34 pm (Space/Science)

Boulder will be in your news soon. podrock June 1, 2025 3:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's over folks RL June 1, 2025 12:38 pm (Space/Science)

Administration solves things the old fashion way BuckGalaxy June 1, 2025 11:01 am (Flame)

Issacman out as NASA Admin BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 9:40 pm (Space/Science)

Lie, cheat and disable mechanisms... BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 8:04 pm (Space/Science)

Big beautiful wall RobVG May 31, 2025 11:50 am (Flame)

2025 Humans to the Moon & Mars Summit May 28 and 29 BuckGalaxy May 28, 2025 2:52 pm (Space/Science)

C'mon a little closer gonna do it to you BuckGalaxy May 27, 2025 9:46 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » Space/Science

Solar wind speed. For ER September 20, 2013 7:39 pm johannes

First of all, heat can be represented by the kinetic energy of molecules, the presence of solar wind indicates that mass with very high kinetic energy content is expelled from the sun, the kinetic energy content of the mass is such that the mass will not return back to the sun.  Since the expelled mass received its energy from the sun and then was expelled, it no longer contributes to the energy content of the sun, therefore the sun’s temperature is that much cooler.  The effect is somewhat like boiling water in a pot, the extra heat energy that is placed under the pot will disappear from the water with the generated steam, thereby keeping the liquid at a lower temperature than the steam.

If we have a accurate representation of the density, speed and volume of the mass loss we can figure out how much kinetic energy disappears into space with the expelled mass. This kinetic energy loss is in addition to the radiative loss that occurs at the electromagnetic frequencies. Such a calculation will work for Earth as well as the sun.

 

The gravitational force is what keeps the atmospheric molecules around a planet, the smaller the planet the less atmosphere around it, one reason for this is because the molecules with more kinetic energy have escaped.

Earth is bigger than Mars, therefore, Earth’s gravitational field can hold onto more energetic molecules, and that is why Earth’s atmosphere has higher density.

If the kinetic energy of Earth’s atmosphere is increased, then more of the energetic molecules or ions will escape into space, and in that process the escaping mass will leave the atmosphere that much less dense and cooler.

Radioactive elements impart kinetic energy to their surroundings.

 

The Earth’s atmospheric density and energy balance has been relatively constant for very long time, but  now it seems that the energy is increasing and the atmospheric density is decreasing, can the greenhouse gas emissions account for such effects?

 

 

  • Photons are fast, the Universe vast, and shoes are made on a last. by bowser 2013-09-23 08:17:10
    • Ok, J. I'll start working on your poem right away.. by ER 2013-09-21 12:36:58
      • The vast majority of energy leaving the sun (and the vast majority of energy hitting the earth from external sources - almost exclusively from the sun)... by alcaray 2013-09-20 23:13:09
        • Charged protons . . . by DanS 2013-09-29 16:50:12

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register